| 翻訳と辞書 |
| EDO Injunction Case ： ウィキペディア英語版 |
EDO MBM Technology Ltd v Campaign to Smash EDO
EDO MBM Technology Ltd v Campaign to Smash EDO and Others (() EWHC 837 (QB)) was a High Court of Justice civil action brought by EDO MBM Technology Ltd, a subsidiary of EDO Corporation, against protesters in Brighton, that began in April 2005 and was settled by March 2006.
It was followed by EDO Technology Limited ("EDO") and David Anthony Jones v Campaign to Smash EDO and Others (() EWHC 2490 (QB)). Two of the defendants, unincorporated associations "Smash EDO" and "Bombs Out of Brighton Campaign", were struck out in April 2005 because they were unrepresented.
== Introduction ==
The campaign against EDO MBM began in 2004. The ongoing protests led EDO MBM Ltd, in April 2005, to seek a permanent high court injunction against 14 named protesters and two protest groups, Smash EDO and Bombs out Of Brighton, on grounds of harassment. The intended injunction, brought under Section 3 of the Protection from Harassment Act 1997, applied to all protesters, not only those named in the court papers (who in any case denied the allegations). Breach of any condition of the civil injunction carried a criminal penalty of up to five years in prison.〔(Cjo - Abstract - Injunctions Enjoining Non-Parties: Distinction Without Difference? )〕
抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』
■ウィキペディアで「EDO MBM Technology Ltd v Campaign to Smash EDO」の詳細全文を読む
スポンサード リンク
| 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース |
Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.
|
|